Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT
Spinning
66.60 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €74.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A edges out Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.89 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). Still, Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a weight of 235g / 8,29oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Fuego LT and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.43 out of 10 (235g / 8,29oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Delphin FRIZ vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Delphin FRIZ


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Delphin FRIZ


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Delphin FRIZ vs Shimano Tiagra 16X
