Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT

Spinning

73.90 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability3 out of 10

Ergonomics6.22 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs

Weight235g / 8.29oz

Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €74.80
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000-CXH
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT

Spinning

82.70 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.62 out of 10

Ergonomics6.32 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight205g / 7.23oz

Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €185.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000D-C
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX offers a line retrieve per crank of 99 centimeter / 38.98 inch, while Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX stands out for a total score of 8.27 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.