Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT
Spinning
73.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €74.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX edges out Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (8.44 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a line retrieve per crank of 99 centimeter / 38.98 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Fuego LT and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.4 out of 10 (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Penn Battle III 3000X
