Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT
Spinning
73.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €74.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Fuego LT and Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.43 out of 10 (235g / 8,29oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X
