Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT
Spinning
73.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €74.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Fuego LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa TANASENSOR
