Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 Laguna LT
Spinning
59.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.82 out of 10
Ergonomics6.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight255g / 8.99oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €39.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.1/200

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X and Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X offers a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, while Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Laguna LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX
