Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X

Daiwa 20 Laguna LT
Spinning
60.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.82 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €39.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.13/200

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY
Spinning
47.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight313g / 11.04oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/315
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX clearly outshines Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch). While Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Laguna LT and Delphin IXCELA AL BODY?
Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI
