Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 Laguna LT, 2500, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10414-255
Daiwa 20 Laguna LT
Spinning
59.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.82 out of 10
Ergonomics6.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight255g / 8.99oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings3

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €39.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2500
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.1/200
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT, 4000-C, left and right hand, Match And Feeder Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10217-405
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT
Feeder And Match
63.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €69.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size4000-C
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X and Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X offers a ergonomics of 6.15 out of 10, while Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX stands out for a ball bearings of 4. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Laguna LT and Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT?

There are not much differences between the two comparables