Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT, 2000-XH, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10425-201
Daiwa 20 Legalis LT
Spinning
63.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank81 centimeter / 31.89 inch
Ball bearings5

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €58.00
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2000-XH
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT, 3000-C, left and right hand, Match And Feeder Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10217-305
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT
Feeder And Match
63.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.06 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €61.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size3000-C
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX and Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX offers a gear ratio of 6.2:1, while Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX stands out for a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Legalis LT and Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT?

There are not much differences between the two comparables