Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT
Spinning
65.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €66.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX offers a weight of 210g / 7,41oz, while Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 stands out for a durability of 5.73 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Legalis LT and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.6 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL
