Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT
Spinning
65.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €73.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX edges out Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (8.44 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 5 and a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Legalis LT and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX
