Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT, 5000-C, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10425-500
Daiwa 20 Legalis LT
Spinning
73.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings5

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €80.10
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size5000-C
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD, 25QD, left and right hand, Feeder Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10924-025
Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD
Feeder And Match
90.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.51 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight455g / 16.05oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings7

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €312.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size25
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD edges out Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.51 out of 10) and the total score (9.07 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 245g / 8,64oz and a ergonomics of 6.18 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Legalis LT and Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD?

There are not much differences between the two comparables