Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT
Spinning
63.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.66 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank92 centimeter / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €82.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/150

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X clearly outshines Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and line retrieve per crank (92 centimeter / 36.22 inch). While Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Legalis LT and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Solid value at €82.90, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of spinning fishing needs
Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X
- With a score like 8.13 out of 10 (280g / 9,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X
