Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF

Daiwa 20 Luvias LT
Spinning
3000d-cx
94.10 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €379.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/300

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX clearly outshines Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Luvias LT and Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF?
Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.8 out of 10 (180g / 6,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X
