Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X

Daiwa 20 Luvias LT
Spinning
3000d-cx
94.10 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €379.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/300

Delphin CarbonIX
Spinning
49.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.88 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €42.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/227
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin CarbonIX 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin CarbonIX 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Luvias LT and Delphin CarbonIX?
Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Delphin CarbonIX 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
