Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW 6000X

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 Luvias LT, 3000D-C, left and right hand, Spinning fishing reel, Front Drag, 10112-305
Daiwa 20 Luvias LT
Spinning
3000d-cx
94.10 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings9

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €379.00
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size3000D-C
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/300
Shimano 21 TwinPower SW, 6000, left and right hand, Saltwater Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 5SF41M061
Shimano 21 TwinPower SW
Seafishing
88.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.79 out of 10
Gear ratio4:6:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight425g / 14.99oz
Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch
Ball bearings11

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSeafishing
  • Price range~ €435.33
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size6000
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 190/0.19

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX and Shimano 21 TwinPower SW 6000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX offers a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, while Shimano 21 TwinPower SW 6000X stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 83 centimeter / 32.68 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Luvias LT and Shimano 21 TwinPower SW?

There are not much differences between the two comparables