Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT
Feeder And Match
64.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.61 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €72.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
85.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.55 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight135g / 4.76oz
Line retireve per crank63 centimeter / 24.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/100
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX clearly outshines Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (8.57 out of 10). While Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Delphin RAYA body


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX
