Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT
Feeder And Match
64.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.61 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €72.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX and Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX offers a ball bearings of 4, while Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.34 out of 10 (290g / 10,23oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
