Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT
Feeder And Match
64.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.61 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €72.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX and Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX offers a ball bearings of 4, while Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX stands out for a durability of 5.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT and Penn Slammer IV?
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
- Rated 8.34 out of 10 (290g / 10,23oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX
