Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT, 6000 SS-P, left and right hand, Match and Feeder Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10312-600
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT
Feeder And Match
59.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.62 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight380g / 13.4oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €74.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size6000 SS-P
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT, 3000-C, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10609-300
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
72.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.73 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €96.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size3000-C
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX edges out Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the weight (215g / 7,58oz) and the ergonomics (6.28 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 86 centimeter / 33.86 inch and a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT?

There are not much differences between the two comparables