Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT, 6000 SS-P, left and right hand, Match and Feeder Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10312-600
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT
Feeder And Match
59.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.62 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight380g / 13.4oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €74.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size6000 SS-P
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT, 2500 S-XH, left and right hand, Spinning fishing reel, Front Drag, 10308-201
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT
Spinning
66.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight200g / 7.06oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings5

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €79.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2500 S-XH
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX offers a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs, while Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX stands out for a weight of 200g / 7,06oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT?

There are not much differences between the two comparables