Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT, 6000 SS-P, left and right hand, Match and Feeder Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10312-600
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT
Feeder And Match
59.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.62 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight380g / 13.4oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €74.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size6000 SS-P
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P, left and right hand, Surfcasting Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10711-455
Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P
Seafishing
79.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.7 out of 10
Ergonomics5.61 out of 10
Gear ratio4.1:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight555g / 19.58oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSeafishing
  • Price range~ €209.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size-
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/300

Conclusion

Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P clearly outshines Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX, offering significantly better performance in weight (555g / 19,58oz) and total score (7.96 out of 10). While Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT and Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P?

There are not much differences between the two comparables