Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT
Feeder And Match
59.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.62 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight380g / 13.4oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €74.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 SS-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX and Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX offers a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs, while Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX stands out for a weight of 545g / 19,22oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano Cardiff 401A
