Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT
Feeder And Match
59.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.62 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight380g / 13.4oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €74.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 SS-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Shimano Vanquish FC
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:2
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €429.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC5000XGC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/120
Conclusion
Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX clearly outshines Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (220g / 7,76oz). While Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT and Shimano Vanquish FC?
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX
- With a score like 8.53 out of 10 (220g / 7,76oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX
Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X
Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX
Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX
Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX
Daiwa BG 2500X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
Daiwa BG 2500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX
Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX