Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 18000-HX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G)
Seafishing
67.80 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag30kg / 66.14lbs
Weight885g / 31.22oz
Line retireve per crank131 centimeter / 51.57 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €850.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size18000-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX edges out Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 18000-HX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the gear ratio (5.1:1). Still, Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 18000-HX holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 30kg / 66,14lbs and a durability of 9.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.87 out of 10 (170g / 6oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 HGX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 HGX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 4000-XHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 HGX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 10000 PGX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX


Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Daiwa BG MQ 3000D-XHX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 10000-HX vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 10000-HX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 HGX


Daiwa BG MQ 3000D-XHX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 10000 PGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X
