Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150

Daiwa 17 Prorex LT
Spinning
4000 D-cx
84.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €176.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX and Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD and Daiwa 17 Prorex LT?
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
