Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX edges out Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and the line retrieve per crank (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch). Still, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a weight of 170g / 6oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
