Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
63.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €94.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX clearly outshines Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). While Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT?
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX
