Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (4.7:1) and line retrieve per crank (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.29 out of 10 (300g / 10,58oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Delphin REDIX
