Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX edges out Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the weight (300g / 10,58oz) and the durability (9.5 out of 10). Still, Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.3:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD and Penn Slammer IV?
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- Rated 8.29 out of 10 (300g / 10,58oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
