Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150

Shimano 19 Stella
Spinning
82.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank107 centimeter / 42.13 inch
Ball bearings14
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €809.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/275
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX and Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX offers a line retrieve per crank of 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch, while Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.6:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD and Shimano 19 Stella?
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- Rated 8.29 out of 10 (300g / 10,58oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X
