Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD, 3010, left and right hand, Match & Feeder Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10406-310
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €292.33
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size3010
  • Handle typeDouble handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Shimano Exsence, 4000 MXGA, left and right hand, Saltwater Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, EXS4000MXGA
Shimano Exsence
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings12

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €421.33
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size4000 MXGA
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/110

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX and Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX offers a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs, while Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD and Shimano Exsence?

There are not much differences between the two comparables