Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano Sienna 4000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150

Shimano Sienna
Spinning
48.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.62 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €27.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX clearly outshines Shimano Sienna 4000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (300g / 10,58oz). While Shimano Sienna 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD and Shimano Sienna?
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- Rated 8.29 out of 10 (300g / 10,58oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Shimano Sienna 4000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Delphin FRIZ


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX
