Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD, 3010, left and right hand, Match & Feeder Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10406-310
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €292.33
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size3010
  • Handle typeDouble handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Shimano Stella FK, C 5000 XG, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, STLC5000XGFK
Shimano Stella FK
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings12+1

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €609.33
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel sizeC 5000 XG
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 175/0.18

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX and Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX offers a weight of 300g / 10,58oz, while Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD and Shimano Stella FK?

There are not much differences between the two comparables