Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
76.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000XGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX edges out Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (4.7:1) and the durability (9.5 out of 10). Still, Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch and a ergonomics of 6.28 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Delphin RAYA body


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X
