Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
75.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €132.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX edges out Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (4.7:1) and the total score (9.03 out of 10). Still, Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD and Shimano Ultegra?
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Delphin REDIX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Delphin REDIX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Delphin REDIX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
