Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150

Shimano Sedona 500 FI
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag3kg / 7 lbs
Weight180g / 6.3oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX clearly outshines Shimano Sedona 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). While Shimano Sedona 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD and Shimano Sedona 500 FI?
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Shimano Sedona 500 FI
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX
