Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150

Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
Spinning
58.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.97 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61oz
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank79cm / 31.10 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €48.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000 HGS
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.14mm-145m / 0.16mm-105m/0.18mm-80m
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX clearly outshines Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). While Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD and Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI?
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
