Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150

Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
Spinning
68.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84 lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank91cm / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000 HG
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/210. 0.30/130, 0.35/100 lb/yds: 6/230, 8/170, 10/140
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX clearly outshines Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (9.03 out of 10). While Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD and Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI?
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Delphin HORNET 20X vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Delphin HORNET 20X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
