Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150

Daiwa 17 Prorex LT
Spinning
4000 D-cx
84.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €176.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX and Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD and Daiwa 17 Prorex LT?
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX
