Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX edges out Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and the line retrieve per crank (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch). Still, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a gear ratio of 5.1:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Delphin REDIX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX
