Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
63.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX clearly outshines Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). While Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT?
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Delphin FRIZ vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Delphin FRIZ vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X
