Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
79.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.74 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €98.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX edges out Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (9.04 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a gear ratio of 6.2:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT?
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Delphin RAYA body


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
