Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Sienna 4000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150

Shimano Sienna
Spinning
48.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.62 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €27.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX clearly outshines Shimano Sienna 4000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (290g / 10,23oz). While Shimano Sienna 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD and Shimano Sienna?
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
- Rated 8.34 out of 10 (290g / 10,23oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Shimano Sienna 4000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX
