Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150

Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
Spinning
58.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.97 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61oz
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank79cm / 31.10 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €48.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000 HGS
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.14mm-145m / 0.16mm-105m/0.18mm-80m
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX clearly outshines Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). While Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD and Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI?
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Shimano Stradic FM


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Shimano Stradic FM vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Shimano Stradic FM vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Shimano Stradic FM


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
