Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
84.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight405g / 14.29oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €299.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
84.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €195.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
