Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
84.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight405g / 14.29oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €299.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
72.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.74 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €98.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX edges out Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (86 centimeter / 33.86 inch). Still, Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a weight of 240g / 8,47oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT?
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
