Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
84.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight405g / 14.29oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €299.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
79.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.74 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €98.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT?
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Delphin REDIX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
