Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
84.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight405g / 14.29oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €299.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150

Mitchell MX2 Spinning
Spinning
3000x
63.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.14 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag7.4kg / 16,31lbs
Weight258g / 9.1oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandMITCHELL
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €29.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.31/125
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX clearly outshines Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). While Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD and Mitchell MX2 Spinning?
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X
- With a score like 8.28 out of 10 (258g / 9,1oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Delphin FRIZ vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Delphin FRIZ vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Delphin HORNET 30X
