Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD, 4010, left and right hand, Match & Feeder Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10406-405
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
84.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight405g / 14.29oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings10

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €299.33
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size4010
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Penn 2020 Clash II , 2000, left and right hand, Saltwater Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 1522156
Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
75.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.61 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4.5kg / 9,92lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings9

Technical Specifications

  • BrandPENN
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €185.20
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2000
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX and Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX offers a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs, while Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X stands out for a weight of 235g / 8,29oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD and Penn 2020 Clash II?

There are not much differences between the two comparables